US Becoming Active in Response to Putin

2014 can be summed up pretty simply when it comes to foreign policy, and it can be stated like this, "Welcome to the 60's". This whole event involving Russia is an all to real reenactment of the Cold War, but with potentially higher stakes. Earlier this week US troops were finally deployed to the region, which is a step further than what had been occurring during the Cold War. These troops will be assigned to aid NATO nations along the border of both Russia and Ukraine. Oddly enough the US didn't deploy any troops to the Ukraine, which may be a concession by the US realizing that it is tactically impossible to deal with the militants in Ukraine without taking control of the country like we had with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Our government can be classified as hypersensitive to foreign affairs, which can be understood because we were the original nation of freedom fighters. We find it our business to involve ourselves with the affairs of the world and at times it has perks such as the relationships built during the World Wars. However other times can harm us much like Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq had internationally due to our willingness to involve ourselves in just about anything. This is classic America and at times it wins the love of the people, but most times it creates resentment and leads to problems within the nation.

I believe that although it is a good step in a direction the United States needs to take with Russia, it hasn't been enough. Our willingness to leave Ukraine to hangout and dry due to Russian control of the Eastern portion shows that we don't want a fight, and the we really aren't to willing to fight for them. It does show our willingness to fight if Russia doesn't stop however due to the troop deployment into other nations of NATO. Overall war seems to be looming based on trends in American efforts to control foreign policy.

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2014/04/23/tsr-dnt-sciutto-ukraine-crisis-latest.cnn.html

NATO Becomes a Presence Once Again

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has began to revamp its presence in Europe, which was hoped would never be needed again after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. NATO was one of the many alliances the U.S. created during the Cold War to help protect the globe from the effects of Communism. Although NATO was never formally disbanded after the collapse of the Berlin Wall, their presence across Europe gradually decreased to a point where the coalition was thought to be useless as it had been replaced by the strong bond formed in the United Nations after the Soviet Unions collapse. NATO however may be needed once more as Russia continues to apply pressure in Eastern Europe causing tensions to rise to a level that rivals the Cold War, hence the return of the alliance.

So how does this apply to America? Well firstly America is responsible for the creation of NATO and is also one of the alliances strongest members. America generally heads all military pursuits and is one of the biggest influences on the decisions of the alliance. NATO's resurgence suggests that the American foreign diplomacy is moving away from the UN and back into its habits of strong arming other nations much like we had between World War II and Afghanistan. Until the crises of Northern Africa, and Eastern Europe the UN was never given a true chance to function as the police of the world, however since Obama has taken office he has attempted to put the fate of the globe in the hands of the UN and it has worked to a degree, but to many nations are hesitant to act with force allowing nations such as Russia to pummel it way through opposition. Due to the inability of the UN it seems the the United States is being pushed onto another route and attempting to reawaken the alliance that once threatened the Soviet Union and kept the communist nation at bay. However today the face a new type of enemy, a politically stable Russia with the support of its nation capable of waging war nearly anywhere across the globe, fueled by a people of pride who are willing to fight for their leader.

NATO is hopefully once again just a measure to deter Russian aggression, but only time will tell. The hopes across the globe is that the crisis in Ukraine will end with a peaceful means. However with the current progression of events it is all to possible that American bases across the globe will be on stand by for war in Europe once again.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/03/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/index.html?hpt=hp_bn2

Obama Abroad

Obama as a President has possibly been the greatest ambassador our nation has ever seen. One of the Presidents many jobs is to go around the globe speaking with the leaders of other nations and making sure that relations and influence stays strong across the globe. Obama as well as many of his predecessors realize the advantages of being a global nation allowing him to fully address the challenge of being an emissary for the American people. But Obama has taken a step that may improve relations at home, as well as abroad with his last visit. The President recently met with Pope Francis in an attempt to strengthen the relations between the Vatican and the US, which over the last few decades has been on a steady decline due to new views in both politics and society. The President also used this time in Europe to visit and address several other American allies in the hopes to rejuvenate the weakening of United States ties. Foreign diplomacy has always been a strong suit for President Obama although his foreign action has been lacking. As a diplomat it is easy to say that the Democrats do the best on keeping the relations of the US and other nations strong while many Republican focus on the State of the Union rather than the state of the globe.

The President met with the Pope to discuss the affairs that are taking shape in Eastern Europe as well as to discuss the future of American and Papal relations based on the way that American legislation is moving in respect to gay rights, contraception, and even abortion rights. The meeting seems to have gone well ending with the presentation of gifts. The Vatican received a box made from the timber of the first Catholic church constructed in the United States while Obama was presented two medals as a symbol of Americas role as a peacekeeper throughout the world.

To read something like this in such a tough time in the world bring some weight off my shoulders. Today the media focuses to much on the negative that it becomes hard to watch the news without losing faith in humanity. But to see the President doing so well outside of our borders in an attempt to strengthen relations is a good sign for the American people. The visits the President continues to make all seem to be leading to a point in which the giant Admiral Yomomoto referred to may finally return to sleep after 60 years as the worlds policeman. This possible attempt to build strong relations would allow the United States to return to isolationism which would benefit the economy in a way that hasn't been experienced since the Roaring 20's.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/26/politics/obama-pope-meeting-politics/index.html?hpt=po_c2

Violent Vladimir and Rowdy Russia

Vladimir Putin has continued full steam ahead on what seems to be his war path. I know that this topic seems to be a recurring theme among my posts but I find this to be extremely important, especially with a highly involved military family meaning that a war of this scale could effect my whole life. Another issue with this event is the possibility of a draft being initiated if Congress eventually decides Russia's actions require the United States to go to war in defense of the globe. I know the history of pre-World War II, and the events developing in Eastern Europe resemble the German rise to power in a shocking way.

Here is a little background, Germany elected Hitler and the Nazi party (initially a political faction) to lead their nation. Russia elected Putin and his party to rule Russia, but Putin has vastly expanded the power of the Russian government much like Hitler had. After being elected Hitler won over the complete and total trust of nearly every German citizen, and everyone was convinced he was the man to bring German pride back from the dead. Putin is the same figure in Russia today, maybe even more so godlike creating a deadly mix history has seen before. With the faith and support of a whole nation behind him Hitler started his mission, defying international laws and nearly doubling the size of Germany before any true conflict had broken out, and by that time it was too late for Europe to react to the Blitzkrieg Hitler had set the stage for, especially with America's weakened economy due to the Great Depression. That was 70 years ago, think about how far the technology has come, and how much more developed war is. Now apply the same level of national pride, a leader with an ambition to return Russia to its former glory, an irresponsible international system, an America nearly as weak as in the 30’s with a failing sense of national pride, and the technology to travel across an entire country in hours rather than weeks. What does that make for? Well you do the math.

Recently the United States has been creating economic sanctions on Russia as our only response to Russian aggression in the Ukraine other than threats. But today Barrack Obama signed an executive order, a power reserved only for the President that is to be used in times of extreme distress as a way to almost order Congress on how to respond to certain events. Congress itself still hasn't made any suggestions of declaring war yet, and although Obama is capable of deploying troops for 60 days under the War Powers Act, he would need Congress to sign such a declaration for troops to remain on sight any longer. These events that continue to develop in Eastern Europe create fear every time Americans turn on the news. The worst event that some experts have begun to predict is Russian interests possibly returning to Cuba. A possibility that can occur if tensions between the UN Security Council continue to escalate.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/20/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

$15 For Flipping Burgers?

One of the heaviest debates to ever exist in our nation, is where minimum wage should be set. For the most part the government has done fairly well with providing strong federal legislation to regulate wages, compensations, and worker safety across the nation. Recently McDonald's employees have created a battle for the minimum wage to increase causing a ripple effect across the nation. But does 15 dollars an hour seem reasonable for someone who flips burgers?

Many people with college degrees are lucky to start at a rate equal to 15 dollars for every hour of work, but when they do gain jobs of this nature, it is easy to say that they were well earned through hard work and dedication. Yet the employees of McDonald's now believe they are entitled to a minimum rate of $15 an hour. In my personal opinion I don't find this fair at all, I work at a grocery store where I make $7.50 which is just barely above minimum wage, but in my honest opinion the work I do, the people I deal with, and the situations I find myself doesn't warrant double my current wages.

There is currently a federal lawsuit against McDonald's corporation and its franchisees for not providing their employees with proper wages. The American government will have the official last say on this case yet it may just be the reason as to why more Americans push to support Obama's plan for higher wages. The power to raise minimum wage lays with congress though, and with the current ability of congress to solve issues, I don't see it happening anytime soon.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/13/news/companies/mcdonalds-wage-theft-class-action/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

The Next Iron Curtain?

Vladmir Putin, the Russian President, has recently created a world of tension among the global community. Russia is one of the globes superpowers in military strength and earlier this month, they made sure that it was clear to the rest of the world. So what exactly has happened within the last week?

• Russia has effectively seized control of the Crimean Peninsula which belongs to the sovereign nation of Ukraine
• Russia recently proceeded with its testing of ICBM systems
• Authorized show of force in Ukraine in order to control ground

The world has been thrown into chaos as one of the members of the UN security council has become a threat to world peace. Putin has claimed that his actions are only to protect the ethnic Russians that live in the peninsula, while many other nations have claimed it is a stunt to secure military power in the black sea. This stunt is seen by many as an international crime and may be leading Russia on a path to economic sanctions, or even war.

Many people in America don't understand history at the level many Europeans do. In the late 1930's Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party used the excuse of protecting German nationals to gain lands in Czechoslovakia and Austria, and now we can see similar tactics being used by the Russian government. However their claims may be true and it may be solely based on the protection of Russian nationals, however if these Russians are living in the Ukraine, they technically aren't a responsibility of Russia and should only be offered refuge within the established borders of Russia. This new advancement by the Russian military could be leading to an all out war as Ukrainian soldiers are on station as well and any excess action between either side could set off another shot heard round the world.

I personally see this creating a global issue, and although many Americans don't believe we should take part in another war, this may be a time where we either act or we allow our home to become the next target. A prime example was when we refused to enter World War II and Japan bombed us at Pearl Harbor crippling our war machine for an extensive period of time. The same event could be possible hear yet on a much larger scale due to new advancements in technologies that are developed everyday. This will be a real test of America's foreign policy to see just how willing the nation is to continue our policy of international policemen.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/opinion/stanley-hillary-clinton-hitler/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

Has Obama labeled minorities?

Earlier today, President Obama made his announcement on 'No Excuses' which was a direct challenge to minority men to make better choices with their lives. Although he didn't directly say it, President Obama was making a clear statement to "Young men of color" to make better decisions, break the label of the stereotypical African-American male that society sees. Another statement by Obama involved his past home life, in which he related to kids of all ethnics when he spoke on his lack of a father at home. He claims this had led him to make some bad choices and the only reason he got on the right track was through his community.

After his talk about his target group, Obama continued on to the funding of his operation, and at the moment has a 5 year plan to pump $220 million dollars into at risk areas for early education to help keep kids on track. This coalition for the greater good may just be the start of something bigger in Obama's road to equality. However this does bring in a major question into play.

Just what is equality, because based on my interpretation of the Presidents comments it seems that his focus lies more in the African-American population, rather than all children at risk. Although I support the Presidents new initiative to improve the nation through vast donations from public corporations, it seems that he may be treading on thin ice. His focus on a single minority is almost an open invitation for criticism and attacks from a broad spectrum. I believe the Presidents intentions are pure, but the concept of aiding a singular group seems to be against the American belief of equality that we recently learned about.